Leaderboard
Listing ideas that aren’t influenced by fear of public opinion.
Showing 1–10 of 10
Rows per page…| # | Idea | Score | Verdict | One-liner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dropbox | 91 | PASS | Strong PASS: real demo, huge pain, sharp wedge; biggest risk is tar-pit reliability and solo-founder execution. |
2 | Eatware | 84 | PASS | Strong traction + ops moat story, but the scale and margin claims need hard proof. |
3 | GitLabs | 82 | PASS | Strong traction and founder-fit, but the moat and SaaS plan need a much sharper explanation. |
4 | Ghostlayer | 77 | PASS | Strong traction on a huge but brittle workflow-automation wedge; likely pass if reliability holds. |
5 | OpenPhone | 68 | PASS | Real traction in a crowded SMB comms market; pass if retention and moat proof are strong. |
6 | RetailBook | 67 | PASS | Real traction, weak economics, plausible moat—YC would likely interview but stay skeptical. |
7 | Flex | 65 | PASS | Real demand in a big market, but it’s a tar-pit physical product until repeat purchase proves out. |
8 | MemoryOS | 64 | PASS | Promising memory AI, but the founders must narrow the wedge and prove trust before this feels venture-backable. |
9 | Vendor Live | 56 | MAYBE | Big market, real pain, but you need proof of repeat usage and reliable data to escape tar-pit risk. |
10 | Smash&Clash | 49 | MAYBE | Real game, real players, but too little monetization or retention proof for a strong YC yes. |
Page 1 of 1